draft-westerlund-mmusic-ice-options-registry-00.txt		draft-westerlund-mmusic-ice-options-registry-01.txt
	Network Working Group M. Westerlund		Network Working Group M. Westerlund
	Internet-Draft Ericsson		Internet-Draft Ericsson
	Updates: 5245 (if approved) C. Perkins		Updates: 5245 (if approved) C. Perkins
	Intended status: Standards Track University of Glasgow		Intended status: Standards Track University of Glasgow
	Expires: May 15, 2011 November 11, 2010		Expires: May 23, 2011 November 19, 2010
	IANA Registry for Interactive Connectivity Establishment (ICE) Options		IANA Registry for Interactive Connectivity Establishment (ICE) Options
	draft-westerlund-mmusic-ice-options-registry-00		draft-westerlund-mmusic-ice-options-registry-01
	Abstract		Abstract
	It has been identified that Interactive Connectivity Establishment		It has been identified that Interactive Connectivity Establishment
	(ICE) is missing a registry for ICE options. This document defines		(ICE) is missing a registry for ICE options. This document defines
	this missing IANA registry.		this missing IANA registry.
	Status of this Memo		Status of this Memo
	This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the		This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
	skipping to change at page 1, line 33 ¶		skipping to change at page 1, line 33 ¶
	Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering		Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
	Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute		Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
	working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-		working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
	Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.		Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
	Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months		Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
	and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any		and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
	time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference		time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
	material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."		material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
	This Internet-Draft will expire on May 15, 2011.		This Internet-Draft will expire on May 23, 2011.
	Copyright Notice		Copyright Notice
	Copyright (c) 2010 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the		Copyright (c) 2010 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
	document authors. All rights reserved.		document authors. All rights reserved.
	This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal		This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
	Provisions Relating to IETF Documents		Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
	(http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of		(http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
	publication of this document. Please review these documents		publication of this document. Please review these documents
	skipping to change at page 2, line 15 ¶		skipping to change at page 2, line 15 ¶
	Table of Contents		Table of Contents
	1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3		1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
	2. Requirements Language . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3		2. Requirements Language . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
	3. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3		3. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
	3.1. ICE Options . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3		3.1. ICE Options . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
	4. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4		4. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
	5. Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4		5. Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
	6. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4		6. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
	6.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4		6.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
	6.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4		6.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
	Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5		Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
	1. Introduction		1. Introduction
	"Interactive Connectivity Establishment (ICE): A Protocol for Network		"Interactive Connectivity Establishment (ICE): A Protocol for Network
	Address Translator (NAT) Traversal for Offer/Answer" [RFC5245]		Address Translator (NAT) Traversal for Offer/Answer" [RFC5245]
	defines a concept of ICE Options. However, the ICE RFC fails to		defines a concept of ICE Options. However, the ICE RFC fails to
	create an IANA registry for ICE options. As there has come into		create an IANA registry for ICE options. As there has come into
	existence at least one ICE option, there is need to create the		existence at least one ICE option, there is need to create the
	registry.		registry.
	skipping to change at page 3, line 41 ¶		skipping to change at page 3, line 41 ¶
	document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [RFC2119].		document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [RFC2119].
	3. IANA Considerations		3. IANA Considerations
	This document defines a registry for ICE options that can be used in		This document defines a registry for ICE options that can be used in
	SDP "ice-options" attribute or other signalling parameters carrying		SDP "ice-options" attribute or other signalling parameters carrying
	the ICE options.		the ICE options.
	3.1. ICE Options		3.1. ICE Options
	An ICE option identifier MUST fulfill the following ABNF [RFC5234]		An ICE option identifier MUST fulfill the ABNF [RFC5234] syntax for
	syntax:		"ice-option-tag" as specified in [RFC5245]. This syntax is reproduce
			here for simplicity, but the authoritative definition is in the ICE
			RFC:
	ice-option-tag = 1*ice-char		ice-option-tag = 1*ice-char
	ice-char = ALPHA / DIGIT / "+" / "/"		ice-char = ALPHA / DIGIT / "+" / "/"
	ICE options SHOULD NOT be longer than 20 charachters.		ICE options are of unlimited length by the syntax, however they are
			recommended to be no longer than 20 characters. This is to reduce
			message sizes and allow for efficient parsing.
	Registration of an ICE option is done using the Specification		Registration of an ICE option is done using the Specification
	Required policy as defined in "Guidelines for Writing an IANA		Required policy as defined in "Guidelines for Writing an IANA
	Considerations Section in RFCs" [RFC5226].		Considerations Section in RFCs" [RFC5226].
	A registration request MUST include the following information:		A registration request MUST include the following information:
	o Name of contact person for the registration		o Name of contact person for the registration
	o Email and Address of the Contact person		o Email and Address of the Contact person
	o Organization having the change control		o Organization or individuals having the change control
	o The ICE option identifier		o The ICE option identifier
	o Short description of the ICE extension		o Short description of the ICE extension
	o Reference(s) to the specification defining the ICE option and the		o Reference(s) to the specification defining the ICE option and the
	related extensions		related extensions
	4. Security Considerations		4. Security Considerations
End of changes. 7 change blocks.
	8 lines changed or deleted		12 lines changed or added
This html diff was produced by rfcdiff 1.46. The latest version is available from http://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcdiff/